Subscribe RSS
Comment RSS
Case concerned appeals against extradition orders on the grounds that the EAWs did not comply with the Extradition Act 2003, s 2(4)(c) and in relation to second appellant on the ground that his removal would breach his rights under ECHR, art 8 as he needed to care for his son who suffered from Sickle Cell Anaemia.
Report here:
Articles in: Art. 08 Right to Private and Family Life
Farnesi & Anor v Italy
May 23, 2009 | No CommentsTaylor v Governor of Wandsworth Prison & Ors
May 23, 2009 | No CommentsThe applicant, charged with fraud, applied under the CPR r 52.17 to reopen a determination by the Divisional Court to send his case to the SSHD to consider a request for extradition to the United States.
Art. 03 Prohibition of Torture, Art. 08 Right to Private and Family Life, Extradition LawWood v Commissioner of Police for the Metropolis
May 23, 2009 | No CommentsThe appellant appealed against a decision that the taking and retention of photographs of him by the police was not a breach of his rights under the ECHR, art 8.
Art. 08 Right to Private and Family Life, Police LawS v Rochdale Metropolitan Borough Council
May 18, 2009 | No CommentsRochdale identified despite its protests and the existence of a confidentiality clause in relation to the settlement of an action brought by S.
Art. 08 Right to Private and Family Life, Child & Family Law, Data Protection and Freedom of Information, Protocol 1, Art. 2 Right to EducationPay v United Kingdom
May 7, 2009 | No Comments
A probation officer involved in the treatment of sex offenders was dismissed as a result of his connection with an organisation involved in bondage, domination and sadomasochism and an associated website. His activities took place in a club which was open to the public. His dismissal engaged both Article 8 and Article 10 but was a proportionate measure in the …
