Contribution by Zoe Picton-Howell
In this Scottish case, an application by a father acting on behalf of his young child with disabilities and serious health problems, for judicial review of section 73 of the Social Security Contributions and Benefits Act 1992, as being incompatible with provisions of the European Convention on Human Rights was rejected by the Court of Sessions. …
Articles in: Art. 08 Right to Private and Family Life
SM v Advocate General for Scotland [2010] ScotCS CSOH_15 (16 February 2010)
March 11, 2010 | No CommentsPrincipal Reporter v K [2010] CSIH 5
February 11, 2010 | No CommentsContribution by: Jennifer Spence
Court of Session (Inner House), 21 January 2010
Lord President (Hamilton), Lady Paton, Lord Carloway
Mr K, the unmarried father of a child (“X”), born 6 May 2002, applied to the Sheriff for parental rights and responsibilities in terms of section 11 of the Children (Scotland) Act 1995 (c.36) (“the Act”). Mr K was named on X’s birth certificate …
KB (Trinidad & Tobago) v Secretary of State for the Home Department
February 3, 2010 | No CommentsHeld that deportation cases did not call for a materially different approach from that required in ordinary removal cases,
Art. 08 Right to Private and Family Life, Asylum & Immigration Law(1) JO (Uganda) (2) JT (Ivory Coast) v Secretary of State for the Home Department
February 3, 2010 | No CommentsHeld that in deportation cases on grounds of criminal offending, a balance had to be struck under the European Convention on Human Rights 1950 art.8 with a proper appreciation of the special situation of those who had been in the host country since childhood.
Art. 08 Right to Private and Family Life, Asylum & Immigration LawIn the matter of Guardian News & Media Ltd & Others sub nom Mohammed Jabar Ahmed & Others v HM Treasury; Mohammed Al-Ghabra v HM Treasury; HM Treasury R (on the application of Hani El Sayed Sabaei Youssef)
February 3, 2010 | No CommentsHeld that there was sufficient general public interest in publishing a report of proceedings challenging a freezing order to justify any curtailment of an individual’s right to respect for his private and family life.
Art. 08 Right to Private and Family Life, Art. 10 Freedom of Expression, Data Protection and Freedom of Information, Media Law, Misc.
Subscribe RSS
Comment RSS
