[2010] EWCA Civ 56
Although the system of single payment of child tax credit to the person mainly responsible for the child indirectly discriminated against men it was justified as a proportionate means of pursuing a legitimate aim of social policy.
Full report can be found here
Articles in: Social Security Law
Humphreys v Revenue & Customs Commissioners (2010)
February 22, 2010 | No CommentsCategories
January 1, 2006 | No CommentsTEST
Agricultural & Fisheries Law, Art. 02 Right to Life, Art. 03 Prohibition of Torture, Art. 04 Freedom from Slavery, Art. 05 Right to Liberty and Security, Art. 06 Right to a Fair Trial, Art. 07 No Punishment without Law, Art. 08 Right to Private and Family Life, Art. 09 Freedom of Thought, Conscience and Religion, Art. 10 Freedom of Expression, Art. 11 Freedom of Assembly and Association, Art. 12 Right to Marry and Found a Family, Art. 13 Effective Remedy, Art. 14 Prohibition of Discrimination, Art. 17 Abuse of Rights, Art. 34 Victim Status, Art. 41 Just Satisfaction, Asylum & Immigration Law, Child & Family Law, Civil Procedure, Commercial and Corporate Law, Competition Law, Consumer Law, Criminal Law and Criminal Procedure, Data Protection and Freedom of Information, Discrimination Law, EU Law, Ecclesiastical Law and Freedom of Religion, Education Law, Employment and Industrial Relations Law, Environmental and Planning Law, Events, Health and Safety Law, Housing and Homelessness Law, Inheritance and Trusts Law, Insolvency and Personal Bankruptcy, Insurance Law, Intellectual Property Law, International Law, Licensing Law, Media Law, Medical Law, Mental Health, Misc., News, Pensions Law, Police Law, Prisons Law, Property Law, Protocol 1, Art. 1 Right to Private Property, Protocol 1, Art. 2 Right to Education, Protocol 1, Art. 3 Right to Free and Fair Elections, Public Procurement, Regulatory and Disciplinary Law, Social Security Law, Sports Law, Taxation
Subscribe RSS
Comment RSS
