Articles in: Asylum & Immigration Law

(1) JO (Uganda) (2) JT (Ivory Coast) v Secretary of State for the Home Department

Held that in deportation cases on grounds of criminal offending, a balance had to be struck under the European Convention on Human Rights 1950 art.8 with a proper appreciation of the special situation of those who had been in the host country since childhood.

Art. 08 Right to Private and Family Life, Asylum & Immigration Law

Khan v United Kingdom Application No 47486/06

Contribution by Maria Clarke
The ECHR ruled unanimously that the deportation of a Pakistani national who had resided in the UK since he was three years old would be a breach of Art 8 of the ECHR if carried through.
Taking account of the time spent in UK, the lack of ties with Pakistan, the strength of his ties to UK and …

Art. 08 Right to Private and Family Life, Asylum & Immigration Law, Child & Family Law

Omojudi v United Kingdom

The ECHR decided that deporting a sex offender who had indefinite leave to remain in UK and had lived in UK for 26 years was a breach of Art 8. The deportation was an interference with the applicant’s private and family life and was not proportionate.
See Times Law Report December 15 2009
Maria Clarke

Art. 08 Right to Private and Family Life, Asylum & Immigration Law, Child & Family Law

R (on the application of EW) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2009] EWHC 2957 (Admin)

W, an asylum seeker of Eritrean nationality, sought judicial review of the decision of the Secretary of State which certified that W’s human rights claim to remain in the UK was clearly unfounded. W had illegally entered the UK, and had been arrested and detained. Fingerprint checks against the European fingerprint database uncovered that the appellant had previously …

Art. 03 Prohibition of Torture, Asylum & Immigration Law, EU Law, Misc.

R (on the application of A) (FC) (Appellant) v London Borough of Croydon (Respondents); and one other action R (on the application of M) (FC) (Appellant) v London Borough of Lambeth (Respondents) and one other action [2009] UKSC 8

The appeals of two asylum seekers (X and M) against a decision that they were adults and so were not entitled to be accommodated as children, were allowed by the Supreme Court.  The appellants claimed to be under 18, however, the local authorities determined that they were in fact over 18.

Art. 06 Right to a Fair Trial, Art. 08 Right to Private and Family Life, Asylum & Immigration Law

Browse by

  • [—]AREA OF LAW
  • [—]ECHR ARTICLE

Cross Reference


Any All

Search

SHRLG Archives

Formed in May 2009, the Scottish Human Rights Law Group is a non-affiliated, independent, professional network for those engaged in legal practice and study, in academia and politics, in campaigning and in the provision of advice. It exists to raise awareness and knowledge of human rights law in Scotland, and to provide a forum for discussion of matters of interest across the field. The group organises seminars and roundtable discussions on human rights and is accredited for the purposes of CPD.