R (on the Application of Michael Degainis) v Secretary of State for Justice (2010)

[2010] EWHC 137 (Admin)

The secretary of state’s apology and admission that he had breached the European Convention on Human Rights 1950 art.5(4) by having failed promptly to secure a review of a prisoner’s release, was a sufficient remedy to the prisoner where the breach had not extended the period he would have to spend in custody, and had not caused him to suffer the sort of frustration or anxiety that might otherwise merit an award of damages under art.5(5). The court also ruled that “compensation” under art.5(5) was not limited to money and that courts should have regard to the Human Rights Act 1998 s.8 when considering the appropriateness of remedies in this context.

Full report can be found here

Art. 05 Right to Liberty and Security, Criminal Law and Criminal Procedure, Prisons Law

Leave a reply

Add your comment below, or trackback from your own site. You can also subscribe to these comments via RSS.

Disclaimer

Full copyright remains with the original author of each article. Please contact our contributing editors for source information.

Browse by

  • [—]AREA OF LAW
  • [—]ECHR ARTICLE

Cross Reference


Any All

Search

SHRLG Archives

Formed in May 2009, the Scottish Human Rights Law Group is a non-affiliated, independent, professional network for those engaged in legal practice and study, in academia and politics, in campaigning and in the provision of advice. It exists to raise awareness and knowledge of human rights law in Scotland, and to provide a forum for discussion of matters of interest across the field. The group organises seminars and roundtable discussions on human rights and is accredited for the purposes of CPD.