Objection to Admissibility of Evidence of Child Witnesses

Opinion of Lord Brodie on the question of how to deal with objection to admissibility of evidence of two child witnesses. The defence contended that the children’s evidence had been contaminated by the way the police and Crown had prepared their cases, with an absence of proper records of questions asked in some interviews and leading questions in others.

Lord Brodie decided on pragmatic grounds that the whole matter should be determined at trial and before the jury, as the trial judge would still have the option of directing acquittal or excluding the evidence if persuaded of its unreliability.

To read the opinion, please click here.

Art. 06 Right to a Fair Trial, Criminal Law and Criminal Procedure

Leave a reply

Add your comment below, or trackback from your own site. You can also subscribe to these comments via RSS.

Disclaimer

Full copyright remains with the original author of each article. Please contact our contributing editors for source information.

Browse by

Cross Reference

Search Type

Search

SHRLG Archives

Formed in May 2009, the Scottish Human Rights Law Group is a non-affiliated, independent, professional network for those engaged in legal practice and study, in academia and politics, in campaigning and in the provision of advice. It exists to raise awareness and knowledge of human rights law in Scotland, and to provide a forum for discussion of matters of interest across the field. The group organises seminars and roundtable discussions on human rights and is accredited for the purposes of CPD.