Van Colle v Chief Constable of Sussex Police

The first claimant’s son was to be a Crown witness against an accused who had approached witnesses (including the claimant’s son) prior to the trial, attempting to dissuade them from giving evidence against him.  The accused also made two telephone calls to the claimant’s son, one of which was threatening but contained no explicit death threat.  These calls were reported to the defendant’s force which took no steps to protect the claimant’s son.  Shortly after the second telephone call, the claimant’s son was shot dead by the accused.

The claimant raised proceedings against the defendant arguing that the failure to protect his son amounted to a breach of the duty imposed by article 2 of the European Convention of Human Rights as scheduled to the Human Rights Act 1998, and therefore that he had acted unlawfully. The judge at first instance held that the defendant had breached article 2, and the defendant’s appeal was dismissed by the Court of Appeal.

On appeal to the House of Lords, it was held that to establish a violation of the positive obligation under article 2, it had to be shown that a public authority had, or ought to have, known at the time of the existence of a real and immediate risk to life of an identified individual from the criminal acts of a third party; and that it had failed to take measures within the scope of its powers which, judged reasonably, might have been expected to avoid that risk.  No lower test applied where the risk to an individual’s life arose from the state’s decision to call the individual as a witness.  In the present case, the charges faced by the accused were minor in character and he was not known to be given to violence.  Since the reported incidents had not involved specific death threats, it could not reasonably have been anticipated from the information available that there was a real and immediate risk to the claimant’s son’s life.  Accordingly, the positive obligation under article 2 had not been violated, and appeal allowed.

Full report here

Art. 02 Right to Life, Art. 03 Prohibition of Torture, Art. 08 Right to Private and Family Life

Leave a reply

Add your comment below, or trackback from your own site. You can also subscribe to these comments via RSS.

Disclaimer

Full copyright remains with the original author of each article. Please contact our contributing editors for source information.

Browse by

Cross Reference

Search Type

Search

SHRLG Archives

Formed in May 2009, the Scottish Human Rights Law Group is a non-affiliated, independent, professional network for those engaged in legal practice and study, in academia and politics, in campaigning and in the provision of advice. It exists to raise awareness and knowledge of human rights law in Scotland, and to provide a forum for discussion of matters of interest across the field. The group organises seminars and roundtable discussions on human rights and is accredited for the purposes of CPD.