Wood v Commissioner of Police for the Metropolis

The appellant appealed against a decision that the taking and retention of photographs of him by the police was not a breach of his rights under the ECHR, art 8. Appeal allowed. The interference with the appellant’s art 8 right to a private life constituted by the retention of the photographs was not justified pursuant to art 8(2). The police’s justification for retaining the photographs for more than a few days after the meeting did not bear scrutiny. Once it had become clear that the appellant had not committed any offence at the meeting there was no reasonable basis for fearing that, if he went to the trade fair, he might commit an offence there. It was for the police to justify as proportionate the interference with the appellant’s art 8 rights and they had failed to do so.

[2009] EWCA Civ 414

Full report: Wood v Commissioner of the Metropolis (114)

Art. 08 Right to Private and Family Life, Police Law

Leave a reply

Add your comment below, or trackback from your own site. You can also subscribe to these comments via RSS.

Disclaimer

Full copyright remains with the original author of each article. Please contact our contributing editors for source information.

Browse by

Cross Reference

Search Type

Search

SHRLG Archives

Formed in May 2009, the Scottish Human Rights Law Group is a non-affiliated, independent, professional network for those engaged in legal practice and study, in academia and politics, in campaigning and in the provision of advice. It exists to raise awareness and knowledge of human rights law in Scotland, and to provide a forum for discussion of matters of interest across the field. The group organises seminars and roundtable discussions on human rights and is accredited for the purposes of CPD.