Helow v Advocate General for Scotland

 

 

The Inner House of the Court of Session refused an application by a woman of Palestinian ethnicity who sought to set aside an interlocutor of the Lord Ordinary refusing her application for statutory review under the Nationality, Immigration and Asylum Act 2002 s. 101  of the Immigration Appeal Tribunal’s refusal to give her permission to appeal.   

The petitioner had alleged that by reason of the judge’s membership of the International Association of Jewish Lawyers and Jurists, she lacked the necessary appearance of impartiality in her determination of H’s application. The court considered that no fair-minded and informed observer might conclude that there was a real possibility of bias on the Lord Ordinary’s part by reason simply of the strongly pro-Israel views set forth in the member’s magazine produced by (and speeches pronounced in the name of) the association.

 

This is available to read here

Art. 06 Right to a Fair Trial, Asylum & Immigration Law, International Law

Leave a reply

Add your comment below, or trackback from your own site. You can also subscribe to these comments via RSS.

Disclaimer

Full copyright remains with the original author of each article. Please contact our contributing editors for source information.

Browse by

Cross Reference

Search Type

Search

SHRLG Archives

Formed in May 2009, the Scottish Human Rights Law Group is a non-affiliated, independent, professional network for those engaged in legal practice and study, in academia and politics, in campaigning and in the provision of advice. It exists to raise awareness and knowledge of human rights law in Scotland, and to provide a forum for discussion of matters of interest across the field. The group organises seminars and roundtable discussions on human rights and is accredited for the purposes of CPD.