Catscratch (No.2) v City of Glasgow Licensing Board
April 28, 2009 | No CommentsIt was held that the refusal of an application to extend a club’s permitted hours, which effectively closed the business, amounted to interference with possessions but that the decision could not be viewed as disproportionate in terms of the purpose of the legislation, namely the protection of the environment.
Environmental and Planning Law, Licensing Law, Property Law, Protocol 1, Art. 1 Right to Private Property
Subscribe RSS
Comment RSS
