Martin v N (A Child)

 

Article 5(4) – the right to court proceedings to challenge the lawfulness of detention

 

The Inner House held that lack of legal representation at children’s hearing when warrant authorising detention in secure accommodation issued was not per se in breach of the child’s Convention rights on that basis that her right under Article 5(4)were satisfied by the possibility of appealing against any decision authorising detention to the sheriff who had a duty to determine de novo whether the warrant was or was not “justified in all the circumstances” whether or not he considered that the original children’s  hearing’s decision was vitiated by any procedural irregularity. 

Alternatively the requirements of Article 5(4) could also have been satisfied by the child being provided with legal representation at a speedy review of the warrant at as early a date as was possible after the original decision to authorise detention.

Art. 05 Right to Liberty and Security, Child & Family Law

Leave a reply

Add your comment below, or trackback from your own site. You can also subscribe to these comments via RSS.

Disclaimer

Full copyright remains with the original author of each article. Please contact our contributing editors for source information.

Browse by

Cross Reference

Search Type

Search

SHRLG Archives

Formed in May 2009, the Scottish Human Rights Law Group is a non-affiliated, independent, professional network for those engaged in legal practice and study, in academia and politics, in campaigning and in the provision of advice. It exists to raise awareness and knowledge of human rights law in Scotland, and to provide a forum for discussion of matters of interest across the field. The group organises seminars and roundtable discussions on human rights and is accredited for the purposes of CPD.