Birrell v Parole Board for Scotland

 

The Lord Ordinary, Lord McEwan, rejected a challenge to the decision of the Parole Board not to direct the release of a mandatory life prisoner nearing the end of the punishment part of his sentence. He held that while there was a duty both at common law and by virtue of Article 5(4) for the Parole Board to act in a fair manner in coming to its decision, there was no absolute theoretical standard of fairness and that rather it was fairness to all involved in the process that was the relevant consideration.   

There was no general rule against hearsay and it was for the board to assess what weight it should give to any evidence before it. He emphasised that the risk assessment exercise carried out by the Parole Board there was no burden of proof on any party.  The proceedings before the Board were not properly to be understood as adversarial and he noted that a refusal by the Board to order release was not to be seen as the Board imposing penalty. 

Art. 05 Right to Liberty and Security, Criminal Law and Criminal Procedure

Leave a reply

Add your comment below, or trackback from your own site. You can also subscribe to these comments via RSS.

Disclaimer

Full copyright remains with the original author of each article. Please contact our contributing editors for source information.

Browse by

Cross Reference

Search Type

Search

SHRLG Archives

Formed in May 2009, the Scottish Human Rights Law Group is a non-affiliated, independent, professional network for those engaged in legal practice and study, in academia and politics, in campaigning and in the provision of advice. It exists to raise awareness and knowledge of human rights law in Scotland, and to provide a forum for discussion of matters of interest across the field. The group organises seminars and roundtable discussions on human rights and is accredited for the purposes of CPD.