Abdadou v Secretary of State for the Home Department

Lord Eassie in upholding a judicial review challenge to a decision to deport an Algerian national.  He had entered the country illegally in 1992 and had contracted a marriage four years later.  It was held that the Secretary of State had failed to take any proper  notice of the fact of the marriage had taken place binding himself instead to his understanding of a Home Office policy to disregard and discount any marriage had lasted for less than two years at the time of an enforcement action being taken.  The Lord Ordinary observed that although the European Convention on Human Rights 1950 Article 8 provided nation states with a wide discretion in the formulation of immigration rules, a decision could be so disproportionate that it fell outwith the margins within which national law could operate and that this was, in the circumstances then pertaining in Algeria, such a decision.

Full report available at:  1998 SC 504, OH

Art. 08 Right to Private and Family Life, Asylum & Immigration Law

Leave a reply

Add your comment below, or trackback from your own site. You can also subscribe to these comments via RSS.

Disclaimer

Full copyright remains with the original author of each article. Please contact our contributing editors for source information.

Browse by

Cross Reference

Search Type

Search

SHRLG Archives

Formed in May 2009, the Scottish Human Rights Law Group is a non-affiliated, independent, professional network for those engaged in legal practice and study, in academia and politics, in campaigning and in the provision of advice. It exists to raise awareness and knowledge of human rights law in Scotland, and to provide a forum for discussion of matters of interest across the field. The group organises seminars and roundtable discussions on human rights and is accredited for the purposes of CPD.